• To: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Subject: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: Christian Nentwich <christian@s...>
• Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:28:19 +0100
• Cc: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <001e01c33067$3e825740$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• Organization: Systemwire
• References: <001e01c33067$3e825740$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• Reply-to: Christian Nentwich <christian@s...>

> I haven't yet decided how to tackle this problem in doing an XSLT 2.0
> Programmer's Reference. It will almost certainly have to be less
> comprehensive than the 1.0 version, or no-one will buy it.
> I've got various ideas, and you'll have to wait and see what I (and the

How about this as an experiment: you write this book, and
then we remove from the spec all the items that you didn't include in
the book.

We can call this Ockham's Pragmatic Razor ;)

Christian

• References:
  • RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by Date: Re: More on namespaces...
• Previous by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread