• To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
• Subject: Re: XML Indirection Facility
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill@d...>
• Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 20:55:52 +0100
• Cc: Robin Cover <robin@i...>, XML-DEV Discussion <xml-dev@l...>, eliot@i...
• In-reply-to: <017301c33135$968a4e60$b6f5d3ce@s...>
• References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306121224430.1375-100000@castor> <017301c33135$968a4e60$b6f5d3ce@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

Jonathan Borden wrote:

> In any case I am not entirely comfortable with having a QName within
> attribute content which is intended to represent a URI, particularly until
> we can agree on a 'standard' QName -> URI mapping.

But it's ok to have Qnames in elements.

?

Bill de hÓra

• References:
  • XML Indirection Facility
    • From: Robin Cover <robin@i...>
  • Re: XML Indirection Facility
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: UTF-8 use with XML
• Next by Date: Re: Expressing mathematical relationships?
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Indirection Facility
• Next by thread: RE: XML Indirection Facility
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread