• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: XUL vs. XHTML 2.0/XForms 1.0
• From: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@y...>
• Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:55:20 -0400 (EDT)
• In-reply-to: <3EE460FF.1090001@n...>

Hi,

  Just to let you know that I will withdraw from the
xml-dev XUL discussion. 

  I'm not sure why I get blamed for the "flame war".
In every mail I cautioned people not to restart the
XUL acronym hairsplitting debate and asked if they
feel stronly about it to send their comments to the
xul-talk mailing list.

  Anyway, I encourage you to put "the flamewars and
name hijacking aside" to quote Emmanuil Batsis and
start/continue the discussion without me on this
important XML issue.

  - Gerald

PS: Don't worry I won't give up. I will be back on
xml-dev in fall and report back on the progess of the
XUL Alliance. So long.

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

• References:
  • Re: XUL vs. XHTML 2.0/XForms 1.0
    • From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@n...>

• Prev by Date: More on namespaces...
• Next by Date: Re: Doc vs. Data
• Previous by thread: Re: XUL vs. XHTML 2.0/XForms 1.0
• Next by thread: Re: XUL vs. XHTML 2.0/XForms 1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread