• To: Fred Hapgood <hapgood@p...>
• Subject: Re: standardization: bumps in the road
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 14:37:30 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20030606182025.64EC461BC5@s...>
• References: <20030606182025.64EC461BC5@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

> (W3C and Oasis) and two that as a practical matter
> have as much clout as anyone (IBM & MS).  That makes
> four.

It's three.  Ever since the publication of this paper
    http://www.w3.org/2001/03/WSWS-popa/paper51
Armonk and Redmond speak with one voice.  In case of conflict, one (or 
both) seems to be silent (e.g., IBM is quiet on the Redmond "Infoset is 
king" approach).

It's quite the tour de force.  I would have paid good money to be there 
when the planning meetings were going on.
	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology         http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway    http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

• References:
  • standardization: bumps in the road
    • From: "Fred Hapgood" <hapgood@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: I had a problem
• Next by Date: RE: YAML Ain't Markup Language
• Previous by thread: standardization: bumps in the road
• Next by thread: Re: standardization: bumps in the road
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread