• To: 'Vladimir Perlov' <vladperl@s...>, "lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:26:46 -0500

My wife is my rule processor and she absolutely forbids 
that.  If she were an XML Schema processor, I suppose 
I could reset the min/max quickly and become a rogue 
Mormon, but so far, I've failed to find the right editor. :-)

Control of contexts depends on who owns the rewards 
that reinforce the recognition of the context. 
Such is the nature of authoritarian systems.

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/sapolsky03/sapolsky_print.html

len


From: Vladimir Perlov [mailto:vladperl@s...]

He is absolutely right that sounds like business rules. And no question we
have to enforce this business rules. Anybody have some suggestions how to do
that? What solution do you have for enforcing business rules? I have at
least XML Schema. But there is problem with XML Schema: contexts dependant
adaptation mechanism is not provided. XML Schema is static by nature.   For
example: in some countries I can have more than one wife. Answer for this
problem is in using rule engine for handling business rules.

• Prev by Date: First point?
• Next by Date: RE: RSS Question
• Previous by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by thread: RE: RSS Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread