[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


luxorxul@y... (Gerald Bauer) writes:
>  For example, Luxor doesn't support Mozilla's XUL
>specific template syntax using <template> tags;
>instead Luxor lets you use Apache Velocity, XSL/T or
>Jelly. Luxor doesn't force you to use RDF for
>datamodels but lets you use XML+XPath, JDBC,
>Collections and much more. Luxor sports new tags such
>as <datagrid>, <portal>, <portlet>, <choice> and so
>on.

You added some things, and you took away some things.  The result
may be great; it certainly sounds interesting.  But
   IT IS NOT XUL

In the long run Luxor -- a fine name, by the way -- and the real XUL
will both be hurt by the confusion that you are causing.

        /r$

--
Rich Salz                     Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology          http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway     http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview         http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member