• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Attribute Order (Was: Create XML )
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 13:21:52 -0400
• In-reply-to: <0bbb01c338de$63605a60$b6f5d3ce@s...>

jonathan@o... (Jonathan Borden) writes:
>You are not the first to desire this. Indeed the concept of SGML
>"Groves" was intended to allow a full fidelity representation via an
>API of an SGML document (or any arbitrary subset as desired).

I agree that I'm not the first to desire this, but at the same time
Groves is a lousy comparison.  I'm focusing on concrete characters, only
then permitting abstraction, while Groves starts with the abstraction
and lets you reach full fidelity only afterward.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Attribute Order (Was: Create XML )
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• References:
  • Re: Attribute Order (Was: Create XML )
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Case studies
• Next by Date: Re: markup, UI (Re: Attribute Order)
• Previous by thread: Re: Attribute Order (Was: Create XML )
• Next by thread: Re: Attribute Order (Was: Create XML )
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread