• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 13:35:22 -0400
• References: <ab7bdvs3gol4j4trlefsiq6g4bfbaou70f@4...><3ED5B096.9080102@t...> <3ED6062E.4080403@b...><014f01c326ba$5d609890$b6f5d3ce@L565> <3ED860C6.5060207@d...><092601c327c7$d78d9060$1401a8c0@snobird> <3ED966D3.E76909C9@b...><0a7801c327fa$e05f11e0$1401a8c0@snobird><0ubkdvgvpofrpd073fqsggau8rf8491fnf@4...>

[Arjun Ray]
> IOW, the GI by itself does not fully discriminate "meaning".  Nor, for
> that matter, need it do so.  To think that it *must* is a fallacy.
> 

After all, it is not called a __generic__ identifier for nothing, is it?  
Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>
  • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: xml-websites
• Next by Date: XML-websites
• Previous by thread: Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision
• Next by thread: Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread