• To: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Subject: Re: latest on IE
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 00:35:40 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <eauidvcrbq30ueh5vt2pjup9c3v81l9lpf@4...>
• References: <r01050400-1026-2A016BDC93A011D7B5F00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <20030601035151.GE31614@c...> <eauidvcrbq30ueh5vt2pjup9c3v81l9lpf@4...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Arjun Ray scripsit:

> I'm not sure I follow your reasoning.  Are you saying/implying that M$
> could be wrong in claiming that browser innovation isn't "possible" any
> more on "Legacy OS's"  (i.e an open invitation to prove them wrong?)

Absolutely.

> I read the Q/A as a clear warning that M$ intends to "market" OS upgrades
> down everyone's throat in the name of "browser innovation".

And every other kind of innovation.

-- 
John Cowan
        jcowan@r...
                I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

• Prev by Date: Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision
• Next by Date: Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision
• Previous by thread: Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision
• Next by thread: Re: latest on IE
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread