• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Is an element's name metadata?
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 16:33:22 +0100
• In-reply-to: <8D1EA20CE6AB1043956A27D60E468F1C027C56F6@d...>

At 15:46 25/06/2003 -0400, Allen Razdow wrote:
>IMO, because field-names (column names) in a relational database are
>referred to as meta-data along with the rest of the database schema, XML
>element names, and the schema/DTD are likewise meta-data relative to the
>data in the element.  Clearly, "meta" is a recursive concept.  As they said
>on Broadway, "Anything you can do I can do meta!"....:)

Has anyone done any serious research into this docheads vs dataheads divide..
if it exists?

regards DaveP

• Follow-Ups:
  • Doc-Oriented vs. Data-Oriented Divide (WAS Re: Is an element's name metadata?)
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• References:
  • RE: Is an element's name metadata?
    • From: Allen Razdow <arazdow@m...>

• Prev by Date: XML-based Automation (Was: Zen or Games?)
• Next by Date: Re: XML-based Automation (Was: Zen or Games?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Is an element's name metadata?
• Next by thread: Doc-Oriented vs. Data-Oriented Divide (WAS Re: Is an element's name metadata?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread