• To: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>,"xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• From: "Mike Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>
• Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 03:37:32 -0700
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <1ecf01c33522$d4ca6520$1401a8c0@snobird>

Bob Foster wrote:
> No?
>
> x{9,12} = (x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x?,x?,x?)

Sure. You're right. The syntax sugar of M-N would be convenient for large
numbers, however, but the use cases are rare, so the RELAX NG TC has not
been falling all over themselves to add this feature.

Mike

• References:
  • Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by Date: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Previous by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread