• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: most contested area of xml schema interoperability?
• From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Date: 09 Jun 2003 14:42:18 -0700
• In-reply-to: <uy90bkq4y.fsf@x...>
• References: <3EE1B804.2040909@m...><5.2.0.9.0.20030609104507.06046748@n...><uy90bkq4y.fsf@x...>
• Sender: ari@l...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Berend de Boer <berend@x...> writes:

> >>>>> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...> writes:
> 
>     Jonathan> tools. I think many people use tools to generate their
>     Jonathan> schemas, which makes it easier to author them and makes
>     Jonathan> the XML notation somewhat less of an issue. 
> 
> Or just use Relax NG and spew forth XML schema with trang.

Aren't you repeating what Jonathan has said? :=)

Ari.

• References:
  • ANN: .NET XSLT command line utility, version 1.2
    • From: Oleg Tkachenko <olegt@m...>
  • Re: most contested area of xml schema interoperability?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: most contested area of xml schema interoperability?
    • From: Berend de Boer <berend@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by Date: RE: most contested area of xml schema interoperability?
• Previous by thread: Re: most contested area of xml schema interoperability?
• Next by thread: Anouncement: EXSLT support for MSXML4
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread