• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 10:46:17 -0400
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F80648444D@R...>

At 06:35 PM 6/5/2003 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:

>This seems like a horrible idea. I sincerely hope the the working group 
>does not alter the data model in such a short sighted manner which 
>unnecesarily tightly couples it to W3C XML Schema while adding a heedless 
>burden on implementers.

I agree with Dare here. Mappings from an Infoset should map what is in the 
Infoset without trying to interpret it in creative ways. I believe the 
current mapping is literal rather than creative. I would hate to see that 
change.

Jonathan 

• References:
  • RE: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
• Next by Date: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
• Next by thread: Problems with refefinements of xmldsig-core-schema and xenc-schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread