• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: xml prefix
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 16:42:22 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3EC2A98A.EE913704@s...>

james.anderson@s... (james anderson) writes:
>the 1.1 cr contains this passage:
>
>The prefix xml is by definition bound to the namespace name
>http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace. It may, but need not, be
>declared, and must not be bound to any other namespace name. No other
>prefix may be bound to this namespace name. 

Hmmm.... that'll take care of it, at least when version="1.1" - yet
another @#X! bit of context to think about, though at least one I'm
already tracking.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml prefix
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • Re: xml prefix
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml prefix
• Next by Date: Re: xml prefix
• Previous by thread: Re: xml prefix
• Next by thread: Re: xml prefix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread