• To: Gustaf Liljegren <gustaf.liljegren@b...>
• Subject: Re: Syntax + object model
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 14:55:09 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.20030523204507.0105a6c0@p...>
• References: <3.0.6.32.20030523204507.0105a6c0@p...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

> Maybe 5 years to late, but I never really understood the argument about why
> a standardized syntax is better than a standardized object model. It sounds
> right, but I can't explain why.

A standard syntax enables communication between separate components.  A 
standard object model is useless for getting your bytes from "here" to 
"there."
	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology         http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway    http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

• References:
  • Syntax + object model
    • From: Gustaf Liljegren <gustaf.liljegren@b...>

• Prev by Date: Syntax + object model
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Syntax + object model
• Previous by thread: Syntax + object model
• Next by thread: Re: Syntax + object model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread