• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working Drafts
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 10:17:23 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030509093338.064decc0@n...>
• References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030506182402.023c9388@p...><1ee.8309503.2be828c3@a...> <1ee.8309503.2be828c3@a...><5.2.0.9.2.20030506182402.023c9388@p...><5.2.0.9.0.20030509093338.064decc0@n...>
• User-agent: Opera7.10/Win32 M2 build 2840

On Fri, 09 May 2003 09:34:40 -0400, Jonathan Robie 
<jonathan.robie@d...> wrote:


> In case someone misread your message, let's be clear: Only the Data Model 
> and Functions and Operators are in Last call.

Good point.  Still, the most fundamental complaint I hear on XML-DEV about 
XQuery seems to be that the data model has gone overboard in incorporating 
PSVI and thus binding everything too tightly to the XSDL type system. 
That's why I mentioned the last call.

• References:
  • Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working Drafts
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
  • Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working Drafts
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
  • Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working Drafts
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Relax NG - increasing acceptance at W3C?
• Next by Date: RE: Blended Authentication (AKA "Granular Access Control")
• Previous by thread: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working Drafts
• Next by thread: Is There Accounting/Ledger/ERP Schema Available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread