[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Subject: Why Standards?
  • From: Jim Ancona <jim@a...>
  • Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:55:40 -0400
  • Cc: jim.waldo@e...
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

Jim Waldo has a weblog post at

http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=4840

which, while not mentioning XML, seems to relate pretty well to some of 
our standards permathreads on xml-dev. He writes:

"I can't think of a single standard that was invented by committee that 
has survived in the marketplace. The long-standing standards are those 
that were first de facto standards, and were described (no invented) by 
the standards bodies."

Perhaps XML is a counter-example, although one could object that:

- XML is a codification of SGML best practices for the web, and hence 
was described, not invented. To me, XML seems like a bit of a hybrid, 
neither invented from scratch, nor a straight documentation of existing 
practice.

- It's too soon to tell. At five years old, XML seems to be doing pretty 
well, but it certainly isn't up there with IP or ANSI C as long-lasting 
standards go.

Some of the follow-on XML standards like XML Schema and XQuery are 
clearly in the "invented" category. It will be interesting keep Jim's 
comments in mind as we watch their progress

Jim


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member