• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Yo' mama's non-technical aguments
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 21:08:55 +0100
• In-reply-to: <opro0w0xi6ezizxn@s...>
• References: <20030511172906.6BFC3134184@b...><20030511172906.6BFC3134184@b...>

At 03:42 PM 5/11/2003 -0400, Mike Champion wrote:
>The other reason that people should "spend time reading broken W3C specs" 
>is that few of us really have the luxury of ignoring the downstream 
>implications of a spec that is widely supported by the major players.

Yes - though that's good cause for a career change, IMHO.  Perhaps the 
"major players" hope that those of us who do not share their priorities 
will simply get frustrated by their favorite toys and market dominance and 
find something else to work on, leaving them the field.

That will likely happen eventually given the current course, though not as 
quickly as they (or I) might like.

• References:
  • Yo' mama's non-technical aguments
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: Yo' mama's non-technical aguments
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Yo' mama's non-technical aguments
• Next by Date: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• Previous by thread: Re: Yo' mama's non-technical aguments
• Next by thread: Re: Yo' mama's non-technical aguments
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread