• To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@n...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 10:08:12 -0700
• Thread-index: AcMTJoSQBxPXWjBbRO6NiFErUxCNPQAAiFOK
• Thread-topic: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs

It may be a minority opinion within the echelons of the W3C but I somewhat believe the rank and file of XML users would prefer if the distinction was clearly made instead of being blended together to fuel philosophical and endless permathreads while causing significant user confusion. 

________________________________

From: Norman Walsh [mailto:ndw@n...]
Sent: Mon 5/5/2003 9:49 AM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs




FWIW, I'm a fan of URNs and I hold the position that names and
addresses are different things. It's a minority opinion, perhaps, in
some circles, but I hold it none the less.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working Drafts
• Next by Date: RE: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs
• Next by thread: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread