• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: ANN: owl.dtd
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 17:08:10 +0000
• In-reply-to: <000f01c32347$4ed94d60$6401a8c0@tbp1>
• References: <3ECFD6EE.D9C06AD@m...> <02f401c3223a$6bfdab60$b6f5d3ce@L565> <026e01c32342$6fd8d1c0$4bc8a8c0@A...> <000f01c32347$4ed94d60$6401a8c0@tbp1>

"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...> wrote:

| Whoa, hold up there, Rick.  How about xslt (and therefore Schematron!)?
| There is no useful schema because any elements and attributes can be put 
| in the document. 

Those elements and attributes are literals from XSLT's pov.  So treat them
as such in the schema aimed at answering questions of the form "is this a
structurally valid XSLT instance?" 

• References:
  • ANN: owl.dtd
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
  • Re: ANN: owl.dtd
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>
  • Re: ANN: owl.dtd
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: ANN: owl.dtd
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ordinary (was Re: ANN: owl.dtd)
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: owl.dtd
• Previous by thread: Re: Ordinary (was Re: ANN: owl.dtd)
• Next by thread: Re: ANN: owl.dtd
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread