• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Syntax + object model
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 18:48:55 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1026-089EF5DB8D9611D7AA160003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• Organization: Propylon
• References: <r01050400-1026-089EF5DB8D9611D7AA160003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• Reply-to: bill.dehora@p...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> Except that I get fed up with ontologists who keep coming round and
> asking why we bother with this mere syntactical stuff, and explaining it
> gets more than a little irksome.  Maybe they're just trolls, maybe they
> genuinely believe that syntax isn't interesting, but damn they're
> annoying.

No denotation without notation!

Bill de hÓra
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com

"A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough
to make one believe in God." -Alan Perlis

• References:
  • RE: Re: Syntax + object model
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Syntax + object model
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Syntax + object model
• Previous by thread: Re: Syntax + object model
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Syntax + object model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread