• To: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Subject: Re: Is XML Doomed ...? (Was: Polemicism)
• From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 08:52:10 -0400
• Cc: Matthew.Bennett@f..., xml-dev@l...
• Organization: BAH
• References: <1a7.13eb056a.2becbbcb@a...>

<Quote>
A significant number of people don't want or need the complexity that
W3C XML Schema brings.
</Quote>

Absolutely true. But I also believe that the specification is broad
enough to allow people a wide range of usage choices, from very simple
to highly complex. Some may choose, for example, to "restrict" their
usage to global elements referenced within content models with no regard
to any relationship between content models, while others may choose to
use the more "advanced" features such as abstract elements/datatypes,
substitutionGroups, extension/restriction, etc. to accomplish what they
need to accomplish. 

So, in summary, I've always believed that the W3C Schema specification
can be viewed as complex, but it is also flexible enough to offer a wide
range of usage choices to accomodate many design tastes.

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton

begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@b...
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is XML Doomed ...? (Was: Polemicism)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Is XML Doomed ...? (Was: Polemicism)
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>

• References:
  • Is XML Doomed ...? (Was: Polemicism)
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: RE: Blended Authentication (AKA "Granular Access Control")
• Next by Date: RE: Streaming XML Processing
• Previous by thread: Is XML Doomed ...? (Was: Polemicism)
• Next by thread: Re: Is XML Doomed ...? (Was: Polemicism)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread