• To: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@s...>
• Subject: Re: Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination)
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 14:24:30 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <005201c32611$d9c59510$a000a8c0@SeairthA31>
• References: <1E0CC447E59C974CA5C7160D2A2854EC098300@S...> <005201c32611$d9c59510$a000a8c0@SeairthA31>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

Seairth Jacobs wrote:

> And then nothing.  The whole purpose of the restrictions is to dissallow
> such use.  RNA does not have defined meaning when inside a document of
> another vocabulary.  If you encountered such a thing, it might _look like_
> RNA, but it would not _be_ RNA.

The notion of publishing a vocabulary and saying "it can't be embedded" 
seems to me profoundly weird.  I mean really *distinctly* weird.  -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination)
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination)
    • From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@s...>
  • Re: Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination)
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Vocabulary Combination
• Next by Date: Re: Vocabulary Combination
• Previous by thread: Re: Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination)
• Next by thread: Re: Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread