• Subject: Re: TrAX passe?
• From: Petr Cimprich <petr@g...>
• Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 19:12:11 +0200
• Cc: "'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <004f01c32111$ecc092f0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• References: <004f01c32111$ecc092f0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030509

Michael Kay wrote:

>>Though the transformation APIs are alive and well, Sun 
>>doesn't seem to use this acronym for the Transformation API 
>>for XML frequently anymore. For example, it only shows up in 
>>the spec for JAXP 1.1 three times (once for the TrAX mailing 
>>list, twice in the  javax.xml.transform.sax.SAXSource 
>>Javadoc). It only shows up twice (on same page) in the 
>>Javadocs for 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 for javax.xml.transform.sax.SAXSource.
>>
>>Any insight on this?
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, it's best to refer to it now as "the JAXP transformation API" if
>you want anyone to know what you are talking about.
>

This is a bit inconvenient if TrAX wants, in a similar manner as SAX, to 
cross Java-world frontiers. Languages like Perl or C++ would need a 
common transformation API too, sooner or later.

Petr

-- 
Petr Cimprich
Ginger Alliance
www.gingerall.com

• References:
  • RE: TrAX passe?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [off-topic] xtext -- encoding declarations for text
• Next by Date: AW: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?
• Previous by thread: RE: TrAX passe?
• Next by thread: RE: FW: having problems with the "|" in field's element in the xs:key el ement
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread