• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 14:54:33 +0100
• In-reply-to: <200305070157.h471vr912020@d...>
• References: <20030507012838.GE3507@c...><20030507012838.GE3507@c...><20030506182451.4f40d846.amyzing@t...>

At 06:57 PM 5/6/2003 -0700, Joe English wrote:
>But the _XML_ ur-type is string.  From the application
>point of view, you might have dates, integers, IEEE double
>precision floating point numbers, et cetera, but as far
>as XML is concerned everything is a string.
>
>If we're talking about a rational type system _for XML_,
>then Amelia's first principle is eminently sensible.  In fact,
>I'd go even further and say it's the _only_ sensible foundation
>for an XML type system.

I'd second that happily.

• References:
  • Re: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
    • From: Amelia A.Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • Re: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• Next by Date: Re: Is XML Doomed ...? (Was: Polemicism)
• Previous by thread: Re: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• Next by thread: Re: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread