• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Testability and Schema validity
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 22:02:37 +0000
• In-reply-to: <oprpstd2jiezizxn@localhost>
• References: <oprpstd2jiezizxn@localhost>

Mike Champion <mc@x...> wrote:

| [purchase order example]
| 
| Given that the test suite definition us going to have to specify how to 
| do all this database lookup or web service invocation or calculation or 
| whatever, why is a schema for the syntax really and truly necessary? 

Test the following for hidden assumptions:

| For example, consider a purchase order format definition.  It will 
| undoubtably define the element names and attributes and content model(s) 
| that are legal

How do you find the relevant element names and attributes?

• References:
  • Testability and Schema validity
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Testability and Schema validity
• Next by Date: RE: Syntax + object model
• Previous by thread: Testability and Schema validity
• Next by thread: Re: Testability and Schema validity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread