• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: One (jaundiced?) view of Microsoft's vision for XML
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 01:28:18 +1000
• References: <Law8-F88O5ESwZQt48v0001b4f3@h...>

From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@h...>

> As usual Microsoft can't win. 

:-) Wheeeeeee

I nominate that for funniest summary of the year. The original article was strange;
so Simon hopes MS will be standards compliant; Dare says InfoPath is; I point out 
InfoPath is not actually on sale; Dare points me to an MS website with dates; 
Andrews thinks the dates have slipped; I ask whether the dates have slipped; 
others mention that they are disappointed in other non-technical aspects relating 
to availability, pre-announcements and licensing.  Hardly MS-bashing.


Cheers
Rick Jelliffe



(Private: not writing on behalf of employer.)

• References:
  • Re: One (jaundiced?) view of Microsoft's vision for XML
    • From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: One (jaundiced?) view of Microsoft's vision for XML
• Next by Date: XML-SCHEMA Q: Adding an xsd:attribute to an xsd:element
• Previous by thread: Re: One (jaundiced?) view of Microsoft's vision for XML
• Next by thread: RE: One (jaundiced?) view of Microsoft's vision for XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread