• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: DAML +OIL versus XML
• From: "Mohamed Fayez" <mfayez@m...>
• Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 21:34:58 -0400

Hi All,

Can "DAML +OIL" replace "XML"?

Cheers,
MF

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DAML +OIL versus XML
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
  • Re: DAML +OIL versus XML
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>
  • Re: DAML +OIL versus XML
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: DAML +OIL versus XML
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What are the characteristics of a good type system for XML?
• Next by Date: re: Why XML?
• Previous by thread: RE: Why XML?
• Next by thread: Re: DAML +OIL versus XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread