• To: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: What are the characteristics of a good type system forXML?
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 13:44:28 +0000
• In-reply-to: <3EC1D77C.CE5E8E5A@f...>
• References: <183.1adfd9d7.2bf204fc@a...> <20030513214401.50a8f65d.amyzing@t...> <001001c319c7$ad510420$6401a8c0@tbp1> <3EC1D77C.CE5E8E5A@f...>

"W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...> wrote:
| "Thomas B. Passin" wrote:

|> So the value types easily get mixed in with the element types, and 
|> bingo, the type system has become mixed up again with the xml, which 
|> we hoped to avoid.
| 
| Isn't preserving this distinction, while mapping from within the XML 
| instance to an appropriate datatype-based processing external to the 
| instance, the function of NOTATION?

Yes, but that would be NIH, and would fail the criteria of Sufficient
Ingenuity and Obligatory Hightech.

• References:
  • Re: What are the characteristics of a good type system for XML?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
  • Re: What are the characteristics of a good type systemfor XML?
    • From: Amelia A.Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • Re: What are the characteristics of a good type system forXML?
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: What are the characteristics of a good type system forXML?
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: What are the characteristics of a good type system for XML?
• Next by Date: trying to do XML Schema validation with Xerces-J 2.4.0, does not complain about unique constraits when using the xs:key feature
• Previous by thread: Re: What are the characteristics of a good type system forXML?
• Next by thread: RE: What are the characteristics of a good type system for XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread