• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Vocabulary Combination
• From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 23:06:40 +0200
• Organization: nil
• References: <ab7bdvs3gol4j4trlefsiq6g4bfbaou70f@4...> <3ED5C2E7.4060805@p...> <gbjcdv80mdhn78c8egd27ltqmndcf64kin@4...> <3ED65B5E.6020600@p...> <c9rcdvos4rkru5l9eg2rgu7ohiulif4fd9@4...>
• Reply-to: james.anderson@s...

Arjun Ray wrote:
> 
> 
> Correct.  The spec is silent on this, and thus useless for the general
> problem of vocabulary combination *by syntax*.
> 

that's like claiming that a yardstick is useless because one cannot use it to
measure surface area.

...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • Vocabulary Combination
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Vocabulary Combination
• Next by Date: Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
• Previous by thread: Re: Vocabulary Combination
• Next by thread: Re: Vocabulary Combination
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread