• To: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Subject: Re: Relax NG - increasing acceptance at W3C?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 16:10:19 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <f.10ccdfc1.2bebbcc9@a...>
• References: <f.10ccdfc1.2bebbcc9@a...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

AndrewWatt2000@a... scripsit:

> Are there any other signs of acceptance of Relax NG in W3C specifications?

There is a non-normative RNG schema for RDF in the new RDF Syntax document
at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/ , but no WXS schema.

-- 
There are three kinds of people in the world:   John Cowan
those who can count,                            http://www.reutershealth.com
and those who can't.                            jcowan@r...

• References:
  • Relax NG - increasing acceptance at W3C?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: RE: Some help
• Next by Date: Polemicism
• Previous by thread: RE: Relax NG - increasing acceptance at W3C?
• Next by thread: Re: Relax NG - increasing acceptance at W3C?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread