• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XML [expletive deleted]
• From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 14:01:34 -0700

> Paul Jensen wrote:
> > It's a good point -- a standard syntax does have advantages you
> > mention. I just find that XML is cumbersome to enter, and often
> > difficult to read.

If it's just a question of format, HTML Tidy is useful for plain ol' vanilla
XML:

http://tidy.sourceforge.net/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML [expletive deleted]
    • From: Mitch Amiano <mamiano@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working Drafts
• Next by Date: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working Drafts
• Previous by thread: RE: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Next by thread: Re: XML [expletive deleted]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread