• To: "'Chiusano Joseph'" <chiusano_joseph@b...>, Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Subject: RE: key constraint question
• From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:07:38 -0700
• Cc: "'Bill Riegel'" <BRiegel@l...>, "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>

I would just get rid of the optional/needed attribute, as it ain't needed.  

> From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@b...]
> 
> I might be missing something...how does that ensure there is a TableB
> with the relationship of "needed"? Couldn't the one 
> occurrence of TableB
> still have an attribute value of "optional"?

• Prev by Date: Re: [off-topic] xtext -- encoding declarations for text
• Next by Date: Re: DAML +OIL versus XML
• Previous by thread: RE: key constraint question
• Next by thread: RE: key constraint question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread