• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 07:16:56 -0400
• In-reply-to: <20030512001134.B32258@w...>
• References: <20030511151936.A32258@w...><Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0305111912540.8419-100000@s...><20030512001134.B32258@w...>
• User-agent: Opera7.10/Win32 M2 build 2840

On Mon, 12 May 2003 00:11:34 -0400, Liam Quin <liam@w...> wrote:

> On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 07:13:51PM -0400, Rich Salz wrote:
>> > Tutorials need to be written based on final documents.
>> Nah, they don't need to lag more than one draft.
>

> I think once we get beyond Last Call I agree, but for earlier Working 
> Drafts
> it can be a lot of work with little benefit -- design documents and
> extensive notes in the draft seem to me more useful at that stage.

How are last call reviewers supposed to make sense of a huge spec without a 
tutorial?

• References:
  • Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Yo' mama's non-technical aguments
• Next by Date: RE: Can xpath replace DOM/SAX?
• Previous by thread: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• Next by thread: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread