• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XML-dev futures discussion
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 17:44:08 +0000
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1024-9F8F027C57CA11D7B5E80003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <007501c2ebd6$0d72c7f0$2000a8c0@w...>

At 11:16 16/03/2003 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>wkearney@i... (Bill Kearney) writes:
> >> Either of these would be reliable. In either case, I think we should
> >> appoint three chairs to run the list.
> >
> >Oh great, what's next, Robert's Rules of Order?
>
>Unless things have changed, OASIS runs itself under Robert's Rules:
>http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2000/04/10/oasis/rules.html
>
>So you might not be too far off. ;-)

+1 on the idea of having a 'council of elders' approach to speak for
xml-dev'ers, as was the case until recently.

If they spoke for a majority, then perhaps they could resolve such issues
as the present one of hosting.

I do like the idea of an xml-dev wiki or some such, to minimise the 
recurrent themes
by providing a webpage.

Just a two Euro's worth.

DaveP

• References:
  • Re: XML-dev futures discussion
    • From: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@i...>
  • Re: XML-dev futures discussion
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML-dev futures discussion
• Next by Date: Re: BOM requirement in UTF-16
• Previous by thread: Re: XML-dev futures discussion
• Next by thread: Re: XML-dev futures discussion
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread