• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: The subsetting has begun
• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 13:14:48 +0000

[Sean McGrath]
 >> The instance is UnicodeWithAngleBrackets for sure. But an XML compliant
 >> parser much turn this mixture into a tree. If it can't, surely, the 
instance
 >> is not WF?

[Gavin Thomas Nicol]
 >Note the term "parser" there. If I choose to treat an XML document as a 
Troff
 >document, is it equally a tree?

No. The tree is in the eye of the parser which in turn is in the eye of the 
XML 1.0 grammar production rules.

I have an OS supplied copy command that treats my XML as a series of 512 
byte blocks:-)

It is the XML parser that attempts to map the UnicodeWithAngleBrackets to 
the productions
in XML 1.0. Those productions form a tree rooted at production [1].


regards,
Sean

http://seanmcgrath.blogspot.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
  • flexibility (was: The subsetting has begun)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SAX characters event and external entities
• Next by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: flexibility (was: The subsetting has begun)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread