• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:45:28 -0500
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F805C1F787@R...>

dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo) writes:
>Interesting, so in this application can you guarantee that all the
>HTML that is being placed in CDATA sections is always going to be
>valid XHTML (ignoring the lack of DocType decl and namespace
>declaration)?

Yep.  

It'd be cool for the database to offer an option to require
external-entityish well-formedness (it's not much different from other
flavors of data validation for database fields), but for right now I can
cover that base myself.



-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • RE: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
• Next by Date: RE: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
• Previous by thread: RE: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
• Next by thread: RE: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread