• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b ebetter off as a crossing guard
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 23:04:12 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <01b301c2f5a4$b33398e0$4bc8a8c0@A...> from Rick Jelliffeat "Mar 29, 2003 02:38:44 pm"

Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> Though perhaps that 1 cent topic is a symptom of a person from one
> post-colonial country weary of the inescapable influence of another
> country. A hundred billion dollar topic!

Hmm.  Is the U.S. a post-colonial country too?  AFAICT, the English
have never thrown off the Norman yoke, either, even if their monarchs
are a bunch of Germans.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all.  There
are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language
that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful.
        --_The Hobbit_

• Follow-Ups:
  • [off-topic] Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he 'd be better off as a crossing guard
• Next by Date: Re: ID/IDREF makes XML generation NP-hard
• Previous by thread: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
• Next by thread: [off-topic] Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread