• To: todd glassey <todd.glassey@w...>
• Subject: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 08:25:42 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <00d001c2f2ea$144042e0$020aff0a@tsg1>
• References: <20030325150453.GF30866@s...> <008d01c2f2e4$47ec29c0$020aff0a@tsg1> <3E8079EE.8376FAAE@b...> <00d001c2f2ea$144042e0$020aff0a@tsg1>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

todd glassey wrote:
> ...
> 
> That makes the W3C's referring to anything that this group does as part of
> its standard a copyright violation unless that precursor work has reached
> the state of OASIS Standard.

What dependency between W3C and OASIS gives rise to the current 
discussion? Did I miss that in the thread???

  Paul

• References:
  • XPointer goes to REC
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: XPointer goes to REC
    • From: "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@w...>
  • Re: XPointer goes to REC
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: XPointer goes to REC
    • From: "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• Next by Date: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• Previous by thread: Re: OASIS/W3C
• Next by thread: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread