• To: "'Chiusano Joseph'" <chiusano_joseph@b...>, Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Subject: RE: Registered Namespace prefixes
• From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:32:21 -0800
• Cc: "'Gavin Thomas Nicol'" <gtn@r...>, XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@b...]
> This seems like a case of Thread Deja Vu...
> 
> I believe this progressed to the point where some felt that a prefix
> registry would not necessarily be useful, but a namespace identifier
> registry would potentially be useful. 

First of all, I started this thread, so it's MINE!  >:-}

Second, I was responding to message quoting me.

Third, the original proposal was to make the prefix (which is a short
string) the namespace id, thus surplanting the URI as the id.

If you want to continue discussing a namespace URI repository, would you
please so kindly do so in separate thread?  This one has not been beat dead
beyond the twitching stage quite yet.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
  • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• Prev by Date: Life as an SGML Neanderthal (WAS RE: The subsetting has begun)
• Next by Date: Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Previous by thread: Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Next by thread: Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread