• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Excel XML
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:02:18 -0500
• In-reply-to: <FB4F95390166B14C90E4DD950D69D6E21A8077@E...>
• References: <FB4F95390166B14C90E4DD950D69D6E21A8077@E...>

At 4:52 PM -0500 3/19/03, Chris Wilper wrote:

>- ss:Type="Number"
>   Hmmm... xsd:double, xsd:float, xsd:decimal might have worked.


Then again, they might not have. Any Excel experts want to chime in 
on whether the built-in Excel number type is in fact equivalent to 
any of the W3C primitive data types?
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|           Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava             |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• References:
  • RE: Excel XML
    • From: "Chris Wilper" <cwilper@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: An approach to let XML 2.n resources hold multipleentities
• Next by Date: Re: XML too hard for programmers?
• Previous by thread: Re: Excel XML
• Next by thread: RE: Excel XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread