• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Registered namespace prefixes
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 16:42:51 -0500
• In-reply-to: <p04330104ba8ff8305be8@[192.168.254.4]>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <E18rSxN-0007HD-00@m...> <200303081403.52421.gtn@r...> <p04330104ba8ff8305be8@[192.168.254.4]>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Saturday 08 March 2003 02:43 pm, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> They're a dozen different ways to do this. For instance, I could have
> a table of which element names belong to which vocabularies, and
> perhaps make the table context dependent. Namespaces just make it a
> lot easier.

OK. I guess I that's where we depart. I don't think namespaces make it a lot 
easier, and instead, add a somewhat problematic mechanism that never needed 
to be standardized.

Namespaces are, IMHO, the epitome of gratuitous standardization.

• References:
  • Re: Registered namespace prefixes
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: Registered namespace prefixes
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: Registered namespace prefixes
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Registered namespace prefixes
• Next by Date: Re: Registered namespace prefixes
• Previous by thread: Re: Registered namespace prefixes
• Next by thread: Re: Registered namespace prefixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread