• To: todd glassey <todd.glassey@w...>
• Subject: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:46:59 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <008d01c2f2e4$47ec29c0$020aff0a@tsg1>
• References: <20030325150453.GF30866@s...> <008d01c2f2e4$47ec29c0$020aff0a@tsg1>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

> This further says that W3C is politically motivated and is not a true
> standards body but one where commercial interests of the insiders are put
> ahead of the standards process -

Do you know of any standards organization where this isn't true?

>  that one person
> says this publicly is all that it takes to invalidate the envelope of
> propriety around the W3C's operations and make the motivations behind all
> their efforts suspect.

Wow.  Do the sanity and motivations of the accuser enter into it all?
	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPointer goes to REC
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • XPointer goes to REC
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: XPointer goes to REC
    • From: "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• Next by Date: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• Previous by thread: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• Next by thread: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread