• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he 'd be better off as a crossing guard
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 19:38:09 -0500
• In-reply-to: <1B17F62CE5189F49984F76841FF2F132FF0E04@m...>

Greg.Alvord@g... (Greg Alvord) writes:
>I am writing is words, nodes have nothing to do this it... or do they?

Words, nodes, whatever.  There are lots and lots of different but useful
ways to look at XML documents, or paragraphs and sentences for that
matter. 

Personally, I'm looking forward to having tools which work with nodes
but don't lose track of the original text either.

Back to the kitchen.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he 'd be better off as a crossing guard
    • From: "zhengyu" <zhengyu@a...>

• References:
  • RE: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd be better off as a crossing guard
    • From: Greg Alvord <Greg.Alvord@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd be better off as a crossing guard
• Next by Date: Re: XML into SQL and out again
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd be better off as a crossing guard
• Next by thread: Re: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he 'd be better off as a crossing guard
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread