• Subject: Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
• From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 17:47:59 +0100
• Cc: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Organization: nil
• References: <r01050400-1024-ED39840450A711D78E560003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• Reply-to: james.anderson@s...

bugs are in implementations.

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> 
> chiusano_joseph@b... (Chiusano Joseph) writes:
> >(1) What are "namespace scope issues"? Namespace scoping is a very
> >useful feature, similar to scoping of variables.
> 
> Wow.  I haven't been able to say "it's a feature not a bug" in a while.
> Of course, that statement's being useful here suggests that there's an
> enormous amount of bugginess and sheer aggravation in that "feature".
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• References:
  • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: dynamically extensible schema
• Next by Date: Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Previous by thread: Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Next by thread: Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread