• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Access XML
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 14:55:43 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1024-66EC351D5A4C11D79EEF0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <r01050400-1024-66EC351D5A4C11D79EEF0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> The URN business is silly, but heck, it's a namespace URI.  Not like
> you're supposed to _do_ anything with it, right? 

Er actually I'm not sure it really is a URI as in conforming to the 
appropriate RFCs - I'm not a URN expert but I really thought you were 
supposed to register your namespace before starting to grind URNs out to 
the world.  So no, I don't think this is acceptable.
-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Access XML
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Access XML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Access XML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Access XML
• Next by Date: Re: Access XML
• Previous by thread: RE: Access XML
• Next by thread: Re: Access XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread