• To: "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>,"XML Dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XML-dev futures discussion
• From: "Mike Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>
• Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 11:42:54 -0800
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3E72CCDF.3000708@t...>

> If Mike Fitzgerald wants to set up a five-way voting booth, that's fine,
> but there are all sorts of problems with vote-tracking-by-IP and frankly
> I personally will pay more attention to who says what here in a posting
> to the list.

I won't now.

> A. Move the list, yes or no?  I think reasonable opinions are
> A.1 I'm against moving it anywhere
> A.2 Yes, please move it
> A.3 I don't care, I'll go with the majority
> A.4 My opinion depends on where it might go

A.1 I'm against moving it anywhere

The importance of xml-dev went up a notch or two at OASIS this week, if I am
reading Patrick Gannon correctly. I want to give OASIS a chance to
straighten things out.

Mike

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML-dev futures discussion
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • Re: XML-dev futures discussion
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• References:
  • XML-dev futures discussion
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML-dev futures discussion
• Next by Date: Re: XML-dev futures discussion
• Previous by thread: Re: XML-dev futures discussion
• Next by thread: Re: XML-dev futures discussion
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread