• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: XML-dev futures discussion
• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 04:56:02 -0500
• Cc: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <3E72CCDF.3000708@t...>; from tbray@t... on Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:49:03PM -0800
• References: <3E72CCDF.3000708@t...>
• Reply-to: veillard@r...
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:49:03PM -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
> A.3 I don't care, I'll go with the majority

  I had troubles initially when joining from Red Hat, I exchanged
a lot of mails with the person providing the service, got all the
technical explanations I needed and since then the service have
been reliable for me, so I'm fine with the service as-is. But if
people want to move I will follow.

> B. If moving the list, where?
> B.1 Move xml-dev to ibiblio.org
> B.3 Move xml-dev to the W3C

Those two are known to be able to deliver the knowlege and computing
needed to host the list in the long term.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@r...  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• References:
  • XML-dev futures discussion
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML-dev futures discussion
• Next by Date: Re: Key and Keyref in schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: XML-dev futures discussion
• Next by thread: XML-DEV Directors
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread