• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 01:39:18 -0500
• References: <E18oMGa-0005t3-00@m...><p04330102ba83b5f45841@[192.168.254.4]>

[Elliotte Rusty Harold]

>
> Does it really? It seems to fit pretty nicely to me. For example,
>
>
>     <doc>This is <strong>very</strong> important.</doc>
>

You turn mixed content into non-mixed elements (temporarily, for the
purposes of storage or table-modeling) by instantiating  an implied _text_
element for each fragment of PCDATA.  You use an illegal "element" name so
that you can later distinguish between PCDATA pseudo-elements and real
elements.  The mixed example becomes, say,

<doc><~text>This is</~text> <strong><~text>very</~text></strong>
<~text>important.</~text></doc>

It looks awful but its function is not to be read and written but to be
crammed into a table model.

Cheers,

Tom P

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: trying to convert Java Date to/from the XML Schema dataTime datatype.
• Next by Date: How do I perform this transformation in Mozilla?
• Previous by thread: Re: trying to convert Java Date to/from the XML Schema dataTime datatype.
• Next by thread: Re: Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread