• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
• From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:43:55 -0800
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1024-7F4CF33F63BE11D7B1500003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <r01050400-1024-7F4CF33F63BE11D7B1500003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> No, I'm saying that it doesn't provide any way for me to say "please
> don't process the contents of this CDATA section as text; please process
> it as if the CDATA section wasn't there."
> [...]
> I'm not interested in suppressing the event, but rather on suppressing
> its effect on the parser.

I don't find it surprising that existing XML parsers
insist on treating their input as XML.

Perhaps what you want is a parser for a language _similar_ to
XML, or a buggy XML parser that misimplements <![CDATA[...]]>
section parsing.


--Joe English

  jenglish@f...

• Follow-Ups:
  • XML sometimes takes programming (was crossing guard)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Full text search with XML input in Oracle?
• Next by Date: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
• Previous by thread: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
• Next by thread: XML sometimes takes programming (was crossing guard)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread